From: "Phil Roberts, Jr." 
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 00:01:32 -0400

Jim Balter wrote:
> 
> In article <546g5f$ki4@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>,
> Phil Roberts, Jr.  wrote:
>
> >
> >Feelings of Worthlessness from the Perspective of So-Called Cognitive
> >Science
> >
> >An Amateur Psychologist's Documented Chronologue of a Frustrating
> >Conversation With 'The Society for Philosohpy and Psychology Regarding
> >a Psychical Anomaly
> >
> >My crusade to obtain a proper hearing for a radical theory of emotional
> >disorder serves as a backdrop for my all out assault on the cognitive
> >science paradigm. Topics include the philosophy of science (paradigm
> >conflict), the philosophy of psychology (introspection, Nisbett and
> >Wilson), emotional disorder, rationality, free will, artificial
> >intelligence (computationalism, Lucas/Godel), and evolution (kin
> >selection, sociobiology). Comment form included and comments heartily
> >welcomed, even if only to disagree.
> >
> >web page http://www.geocities.com/Athens/5476
> 
> I think that the main thing to be drawn from all of this is that referee's
> comments should not be included in rejection letters.
> 

Ahmen!  What's really needed is less accountability.  That would most 
definitely be the best possible thing for cognitive science.  You've 
got my vote.

I suggest you have a look see for yourself, but than I'm ownlee an 
ilitereight ameetuer.!? 

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/5476